2008 Audi A6 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2008 Audi A6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 82 kg more than 2008 Audi A6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Impala (380 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi A6. (301 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 2005 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A6 | Impala |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 3786 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1617 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |