2008 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,976 cc, 2008 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 125 kg more than 2008 Audi A6.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Audi A6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (340 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi A6. (301 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi A6 | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A6 | XF |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.7 seconds | 7.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1535 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2909 mm |