2008 Audi Q7 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2008 Audi Q7 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2008 Audi Q7. (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2008 Audi Q7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi Q7 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2008 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi Q7 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | Q7 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 6964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2240 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 40 L |