2008 Audi Q7 vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Audi Q7 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Audi Q7 (345 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi Q7 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi Q7 (440 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi Q7 | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | Q7 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2240 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2540 mm |