2008 Audi Q7 vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2008 Audi Q7 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi Q7 weights approximately 1305 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2008 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi Q7 | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | Q7 | XJR |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3598 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2205 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 90 L |