2008 Audi Q7 vs. 1992 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2008 Audi Q7 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2008 Audi Q7. (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2008 Audi Q7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi Q7 weights approximately 416 kg more than 1992 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2008 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi Q7. (360 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi Q7.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi Q7 | 1992 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | Q7 | XJR |
Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 5992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 333 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3650 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 254 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.3 seconds | 6.8 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2240 kg | 1824 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 21.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 89 L |