2008 Audi Q7 vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2008 Audi Q7 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 SsangYong Stavic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 SsangYong Stavic would be higher. At 3,595 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Audi Q7 (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (217 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi Q7 (360 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 SsangYong Stavic. (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2008 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 SsangYong Stavic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi Q7 | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | Q7 | Stavic |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 80 L |