2008 Audi Q7 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Audi Q7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Audi Q7 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2008 Audi Q7. (230 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2008 Audi Q7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi Q7 weights approximately 725 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi Q7 (500 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (373 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2008 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi Q7 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | Q7 | ATS |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 61 L |