2008 Audi RS6 vs. 1969 Austin 3-Litre
To start off, 2008 Audi RS6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 4,175 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Audi RS6 (580 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 456 more horse power than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 2008 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi RS6 (881 Nm @ 6250 RPM) has 663 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi RS6 | 1969 Austin 3-Litre | |
| Make | Audi | Austin |
| Model | RS6 | 3-Litre |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4175 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 580 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 881 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
