2008 Audi RS6 vs. 1969 Bristol 410
To start off, 2008 Audi RS6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Bristol 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Bristol 410 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Bristol 410 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Audi RS6 (580 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 365 more horse power than 1969 Bristol 410. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1969 Bristol 410.
Because 2008 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Bristol 410. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi RS6 (881 Nm @ 6250 RPM) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Bristol 410. (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Bristol 410.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi RS6 | 1969 Bristol 410 | |
Make | Audi | Bristol |
Model | RS6 | 410 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4175 cc | 5211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 580 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 881 Nm | 463 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |