2008 Audi RS6 vs. 2000 GMC Savana
To start off, 2008 Audi RS6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Savana would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Audi RS6 (580 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 383 more horse power than 2000 GMC Savana. (197 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Savana.
Because 2008 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 GMC Savana. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi RS6 (881 Nm @ 6250 RPM) has 543 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Savana. (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi RS6 | 2000 GMC Savana | |
| Make | Audi | GMC |
| Model | RS6 | Savana |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4175 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 580 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 881 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 244 km/hour | 172 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 15 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2020 mm |
