2008 Audi TT vs. 1948 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Studebaker Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 198 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Because 1948 Studebaker Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Studebaker Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi TT | 1948 Studebaker Commander | |
| Make | Audi | Studebaker |
| Model | TT | Commander |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3703 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 111.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3030 mm |
