2008 Audi TT vs. 1952 Austin A 70
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Because 1952 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi TT | 1952 Austin A 70 | |
| Make | Audi | Austin |
| Model | TT | A 70 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 79.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 111.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 63 L |
