2008 Audi TT vs. 1955 Rover P4
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,102 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Rover P4 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Because 1955 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (280 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Rover P4. (150 Nm). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1955 Rover P4 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | P4 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2102 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 65.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 7.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 52 L |