2008 Audi TT vs. 1956 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 250 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Because 1956 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi TT | 1956 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | TT | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 5112 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 223 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2600 mm |
