2008 Audi TT vs. 1960 Chevrolet Corvair
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 2,368 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 90 kg more than 1960 Chevrolet Corvair.
Because 1960 Chevrolet Corvair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1960 Chevrolet Corvair | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Corvair |
Year Released | 2008 | 1960 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |