2008 Audi TT vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 190 kg more than 1968 Jaguar E Type.
Because 2008 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Jaguar E Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | E Type |
Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1190 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 63 L |