2008 Audi TT vs. 1970 Jaguar Type E
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar Type E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar Type E would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar Type E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Jaguar Type E (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2008 Audi TT. (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Jaguar Type E should accelerate faster than 2008 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jaguar Type E weights approximately 85 kg more than 2008 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Jaguar Type E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Jaguar Type E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi TT | 1970 Jaguar Type E | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | TT | Type E |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2450 mm |
