2008 Audi TT vs. 1972 Rover 2000
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover 2000 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Because 1972 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover 2000. (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1972 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2640 mm |