2008 Audi TT vs. 1981 Nissan Leopard
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 155 kg more than 1981 Nissan Leopard.
Because 1981 Nissan Leopard is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Nissan Leopard. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Nissan Leopard. (147 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Nissan Leopard.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1981 Nissan Leopard | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Leopard |
Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2630 mm |