2008 Audi TT vs. 1982 Zastava 132
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 162 kg more than 1982 Zastava 132.
Because 1982 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi TT | 1982 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | TT | 132 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1098 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2560 mm |
