2008 Audi TT vs. 1985 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 15 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Because 1985 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Nissan Cedric. (168 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1985 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 168 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2740 mm |