2008 Audi TT vs. 1986 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 324 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1986 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Colt |
Year Released | 2008 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2390 mm |