2008 Audi TT vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 170 kg more than 1992 Rover 216.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 216. (140 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 216.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1992 Rover 216 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 216 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |