2008 Audi TT vs. 1994 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,238 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (302 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1994 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | XJ6 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 3238 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 216 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 81 L |