2008 Audi TT vs. 1995 Rover 800
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 800 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 800 weights approximately 4 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Because 2008 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover 800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 800. (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 800.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 1995 Rover 800 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 800 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |