2008 Audi TT vs. 1999 Nissan XVL
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan XVL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan XVL would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan XVL is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan XVL (310 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi TT. (280 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan XVL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi TT. 1999 Nissan XVL has automatic transmission and 2008 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2008 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan XVL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi TT | 1999 Nissan XVL | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | XVL |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |
