2008 Audi TT vs. 2000 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 630 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Because 2008 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2000 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | SSR |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 5324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 481 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 2150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2950 mm |