2008 Audi TT vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 222 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 2008 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Artic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Artic |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |