2008 Audi TT vs. 2002 Rover 45
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Rover 45. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Rover 45 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 155 kg more than 2002 Rover 45.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Rover 45. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2002 Rover 45 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | TT | 45 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |