2008 Audi TT vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar X-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar X-Type would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 242 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (443 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi TT. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | TT | X-Type |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 443 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 18.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1502 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |