2008 Audi TT vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 1017 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (441 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi TT. (320 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | TT | Savana |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 5359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 285 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 117 L |