2008 Audi TT vs. 2004 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Grand Scenic would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 585 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (280 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Grand Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Audi TT | 2004 Renault Grand Scenic | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | TT | Grand Scenic |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |
