2008 Audi TT vs. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Uplander would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 517 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (320 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. (298 Nm). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2005 Chevrolet Uplander | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | TT | Uplander |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 2107 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 95 L |