2008 Audi TT vs. 2006 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Commander would be higher. At 4,703 cc, 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 157 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (414 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi TT. (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2006 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | Commander |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 4703 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 414 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1677 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 78 L |