2008 Audi TT vs. 2006 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan 350Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan 350Z would be higher. At 3,491 cc, 2006 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan 350Z (300 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2008 Audi TT. (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 2008 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 63 kg more than 2006 Nissan 350Z.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan 350Z (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Audi TT. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2006 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | 350Z |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3491 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1252 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 76 L |