2008 Audi TT vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 395 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 2008 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 6 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2488 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |