2008 Audi TT vs. 2012 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2012 Nissan Rogue is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Audi TT weights approximately 10 kg more than 2012 Nissan Rogue.
Because 2008 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Rogue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Audi TT | 2012 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Rogue |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4656 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |