2008 Bentley Arnage vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 Bentley Arnage is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Bentley Arnage (500 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 303 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Bentley Arnage should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 495 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Bentley Arnage | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
| Model | Arnage | 62 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2585 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5410 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3120 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 96 L | 79 L |
