2008 Bentley Continental GT vs. 1969 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2008 Bentley Continental GT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Bentley Continental GT (600 HP) has 245 more horse power than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. (355 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Bentley Continental GT should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2008 Bentley Continental GT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Bentley Continental GT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Bentley Continental GT (750 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Bentley Continental GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Bentley Continental GT | 1969 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Bentley | Ford |
Model | Continental GT | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 7029 cc |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 355 HP |
Torque | 750 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 13.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 29.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 91 L |