2008 Bentley Continental GT vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2008 Bentley Continental GT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,998 cc, 2008 Bentley Continental GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Bentley Continental GT (600 HP) has 375 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Bentley Continental GT should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Bentley Continental GT weights approximately 18 kg more than 2004 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Bentley Continental GT (750 Nm) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 2008 Bentley Continental GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Bentley Continental GT | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Bentley | Ford |
Model | Continental GT | E-250 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 4605 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 750 Nm | 389 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 132 L |