2008 Bentley Continental GT vs. 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser
To start off, 2008 Bentley Continental GT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. At 6,000 cc, 2008 Bentley Continental GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Bentley Continental GT (641 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 461 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (180 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Bentley Continental GT should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Bentley Continental GT weights approximately 824 kg more than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Bentley Continental GT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Bentley Continental GT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Bentley Continental GT (780 Nm) has 495 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (285 Nm). This means 2008 Bentley Continental GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Bentley Continental GT | 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser | |
Make | Bentley | Chrysler |
Model | Continental GT | PT Cruiser |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Horse Power | 641 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 780 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.2 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2388 kg | 1564 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 57 L |