2008 Bentley Continental GTC vs. 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen
To start off, 2008 Bentley Continental GTC is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen would be higher. At 13,600 cc (16 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen (1,001 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 449 more horse power than 2008 Bentley Continental GTC. (552 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen should accelerate faster than 2008 Bentley Continental GTC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Bentley Continental GTC weights approximately 205 kg more than 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen.
Because 2008 Bentley Continental GTC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Bentley Continental GTC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen (1,356 Nm) has 706 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Bentley Continental GTC. (650 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Bentley Continental GTC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Bentley Continental GTC | 2003 Cadillac V Sixteen | |
| Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
| Model | Continental GTC | V Sixteen |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 13600 cc |
| Engine Type | W | V |
| Horse Power | 552 HP | 1001 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 650 Nm | 1356 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.2 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2475 kg | 2270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3560 mm |
