2008 Bentley Continental GTC vs. 2004 BMW M3
To start off, 2008 Bentley Continental GTC is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,998 cc, 2008 Bentley Continental GTC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Bentley Continental GTC (552 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 2004 BMW M3. (317 HP @ 7250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Bentley Continental GTC should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Bentley Continental GTC weights approximately 700 kg more than 2004 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Bentley Continental GTC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Bentley Continental GTC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Bentley Continental GTC (650 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 2008 Bentley Continental GTC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Bentley Continental GTC | 2004 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Bentley | BMW |
| Model | Continental GTC | M3 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 3169 cc |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 552 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 7250 RPM |
| Torque | 650 Nm | 355 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.2 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2475 kg | 1775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.3 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 63 L |
