2008 BMW 120 vs. 1951 Buick 40
To start off, 2008 BMW 120 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 120 (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 120 should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick 40 weights approximately 285 kg more than 2008 BMW 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 120. (200 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1951 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 120.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 120 | 1951 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 120 | 40 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1635 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3090 mm |