2008 BMW 120 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 BMW 120 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2008 BMW 120. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 695 kg more than 2008 BMW 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 120 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 120 | 62 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 75 L |