2008 BMW 120 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2008 BMW 120 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2008 BMW 120. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 785 kg more than 2008 BMW 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW 120 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 120 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 79 L |
