2008 BMW 130 vs. 2000 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2008 BMW 130 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 583 more horse power than 2008 BMW 130. (260 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW 130. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW 130 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2000 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 675 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 130. (315 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 130.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 130 | 2000 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | BMW | Lotec |
Model | 130 | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2994 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1150 mm |