2008 BMW 130 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 BMW 130 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW 130 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 130 (260 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 130 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 235 kg more than 2008 BMW 130.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 BMW 130. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 130. (315 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 130.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 130 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 130 | Celica |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2994 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 622 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 87 L |