2008 BMW 135 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 BMW 135 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 135 (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 135 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 495 kg more than 2008 BMW 135.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 135. (407 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 135.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 135 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 135 | 62 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 582 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 75 L |